Victor Osimhen has been a prominent subject of discussion in numerous European publications for an extended period of time. The striker’s remarkable performance at SSC Napoli has elevated his status to that of a highly sought-after player in Europe, particularly as the summer transfer window approaches, attracting interest from several Premier League clubs. Consequently, the deliberation arises as to which club would be the most suitable destination for him. This inquiry forms the basis of our examination. Collaborating with experts specializing in Arsenal (Harry Symeou), Chelsea (Tom Gott), and Manchester United (Scott Saunders) for 90min, we have meticulously evaluated the advantages and disadvantages associated with each club’s potential acquisition of Osimhen for the upcoming summer transfer window.
Arsenal
Pros:
Being a part of a team that has managed to generate sufficient scoring opportunities to secure 21 goals in their recent four Premier League matches, despite lacking a prolific number nine, presents an enticing prospect. This scenario holds particular allure for any accomplished striker, a description that aptly fits Osimhen. The 25-year-old’s impressive goal-scoring record at Napoli, tallying 61 goals in 99 Serie A appearances, underscores his prowess. His adeptness in and around the penalty area instills confidence that he can replicate his success in the Premier League. Considering the interest from other clubs, Osimhen’s potential acquisition would serve as a notable statement signing for Arsenal.
Cons:
The predominant factor under consideration is the potential financial expenditure associated with the acquisition. With Napoli president Aurelio De Laurentiis known for his stringent negotiation stance, Arsenal faces the challenge of persuading him to accept their bid, which is likely to exceed the £112m valuation for the forward. Moreover, should the transfer materialize, uncertainties persist regarding Victor Osimhen’s compatibility with Mikel Arteta’s tactical approach. Questions arise concerning his ability to effectively execute pressing maneuvers in the attacking third and serve as a conduit for Arsenal’s wide players, akin to Gabriel Jesus. Presently, these matters remain unresolved.
Chelsea
Pros:
The circulation of photographs depicting a youthful Osimhen adorned in a Chelsea football jersey on various social media platforms underscores the significance of acquiring a player who harbors genuine affection for the club. Osimhen’s track record as a prolific goal scorer across multiple leagues, including the Belgian Pro League, Ligue 1, and Serie A, along with his imposing physical attributes, lends credence to the notion that he may represent a viable solution to Chelsea’s recent struggles in the number nine position. Moreover, his potential acquisition could potentially serve as a considerable improvement over the incumbent player, Nicolas Jackson.
Cons:
The fee in question remains a significant concern.
Notwithstanding the considerable influx of players in recent seasons, the present Chelsea squad remains in need of substantial improvements. Acquiring a player of Osimhen’s caliber at such a high cost would potentially constrain the club’s ability to address other deficiencies within the squad.
Furthermore, Osimhen’s recent history of hamstring and muscle injuries presents a cause for apprehension for Chelsea. The team already accommodates numerous senior players with inconsistent fitness records, exemplified by Reece James. Consequently, it appears unlikely that the club would readily seize the opportunity to acquire another player with similar concerns.
Manchester United
Pros:
Manchester United faces a shortage of high-quality options in the forward position, making Victor Osimhen a prime target for acquisition this summer, likely representing the pinnacle of available talent. Given Bruno Fernandes’s adeptness at delivering precise crosses into the penalty area, Osimhen’s presence would greatly enhance the team’s scoring potential at Old Trafford.
Furthermore, securing Osimhen would provide the additional advantage of preventing rival clubs from acquiring his services, thereby bolstering United’s competitive edge.
Cons:
United’s current financial predicament, coupled with significant deficiencies in key areas of their squad, particularly in defense and midfield, suggests that allocating over £100m towards the acquisition of a single player would not be a prudent decision.
Under the new ownership of INEOS, Manchester United must strategically pursue more cost-effective signings to bolster the overall strength of the team.
Furthermore, signing Osimhen would pose a significant risk of impeding the development of Rasmus Hojlund. The promising young striker has demonstrated considerable progress since the beginning of the year, notwithstanding a recent minor injury. It would be regrettable to halt the nurturing of his talents and designate him as the club’s primary number nine moving forward.